Food Fraud Remains Widespread Despite New Detection Technologies
At a glance
- Up to 10% of retail food products may be adulterated
- Food fraud costs the US up to $15 billion annually
- Olive oil, honey, and coffee are frequent targets
Food fraud, which includes the adulteration, mislabeling, substitution, or counterfeiting of food products for economic gain, continues to affect the global food industry despite advancements in detection technologies.
Experts estimate that a considerable portion of food products sold in retail settings contain some level of adulteration. This ongoing issue results in substantial financial losses for both the United States and the European Union each year.
High-value items such as olive oil, honey, and coffee are among the most commonly targeted goods due to their market price and the relative ease with which they can be adulterated. These products are often subject to economically motivated manipulation, which can be difficult to detect without specialized testing methods.
Analytical and digital tools, including DNA barcoding, CRISPR diagnostics, next-generation sequencing, and blockchain, have been developed to identify fraudulent activity in the food supply chain. However, the integration of these technologies into regulatory and industrial frameworks has been inconsistent, largely due to challenges related to cost, standardization, and system complexity.
What the numbers show
- Up to 10% of retail food products are estimated to be adulterated
- Annual economic damage from food fraud is $10–15 billion in the US
- Food fraud costs the EU €8–12 billion each year
Rapid, non-destructive analysis methods such as spectroscopic, electronic, and DNA-based techniques have been introduced to improve detection. Despite their speed, these approaches sometimes lack the specificity required for accurate identification or depend on complex laboratory procedures, limiting their widespread application.
Emerging technologies like Front-Face Fluorescence spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence offer additional non-destructive testing options. Nonetheless, these methods still encounter obstacles related to specificity, expense, and accessibility, which restrict their broader use in food fraud prevention.
AI and blockchain solutions are being explored to enhance traceability and detection capabilities. However, these technologies face barriers such as high implementation costs, data integration difficulties, and limited standardization, which have slowed their adoption in the food industry.
The use of AI in food fraud detection is further complicated by data limitations, integration challenges, and the evolving tactics employed by those committing fraud. Additionally, AI can be used by fraudsters to create fake documentation, adapt their methods, and impersonate supply chain participants, which can make fraudulent activities more difficult to uncover.
* This article is based on publicly available information at the time of writing.
Sources and further reading
- Food fraud is a growing economic and health issue – but AI and blockchain technology can help combat it | Bangor University
- Advanced analytical and digital approaches for proactive detection of food fraud as an emerging contaminant threat | Science Direct
- Food fraud threatening food safety - what is being done to stop it
- Food defense - Wikipedia
- Food Fraud Detection with AI - PublicSphereTech
- Food fraud predictions 2026 and beyond: new targets, tactics and risks
Note: This section is not provided in the feeds.
More on Technology
-
Takeda and Iambic Sign Multi-Year Drug Discovery Collaboration
A multi-year agreement focuses on oncology and gastrointestinal drug programs, according to reports. Iambic may receive over $1.7 billion.
-
AI Chatbot Use in Healthcare Raises Safety and Trust Concerns
ECRI identified AI chatbot misuse as the top health tech hazard for 2026, with unsafe response rates between 5% and 13%, according to reports.
-
New York Requires Companies to Disclose AI Role in Mass Layoffs
A new regulation mandates disclosure of AI's involvement in layoffs, effective March 2025, according to state officials. Transparency is the goal.
-
Navy Internship Programs Offer Research Opportunities for Students
Over 800 placements for NREIP and 300 for SEAP are available annually, according to reports. Applications are accepted from August 1 to November 1.