Statin Side-Effect Labels Challenged by Large-Scale Study
At a glance
- Meta-analysis reviewed 66 statin side-effects listed on labels
- Only four side-effects found to have supporting evidence
- Study included data from about 124,000 participants
A comprehensive review of statin side-effects has raised questions about the accuracy of information provided on drug labels, based on evidence from large-scale clinical trials.
The analysis, published in The Lancet, examined 66 side-effects commonly listed on statin product labels and found that only four—liver test changes, minor liver abnormalities, urine changes, and tissue swelling—were supported by trial data, with these risks described as very small.
Researchers at Oxford Population Health conducted the study, which was part-funded by the British Heart Foundation. The review assessed data from randomized controlled trials involving approximately 124,000 participants, with an average follow-up period of 4.5 years.
For the majority of listed side-effects, including memory problems, depression, sleep disturbances, nerve damage, weight gain, nausea, fatigue, headache, erectile dysfunction, and cognitive impairment, the analysis found no significant excess risk associated with statin use.
What the numbers show
- 66 side-effects were reviewed from statin product labels
- Only 4 side-effects had supporting evidence from trials
- About 124,000 participants were included in the analysis
- Average follow-up duration was 4.5 years
- Roughly 1% increased risk of muscle symptoms in the first year
The study confirmed a roughly 1% increased risk of muscle symptoms during the first year of statin use. It also identified a small increase in blood sugar levels, which can accelerate diabetes onset in individuals already susceptible to the condition.
Despite the findings on side-effects, statins remain established as effective in reducing heart attacks, strokes, and deaths related to cardiovascular disease. The benefits of statin therapy continue to outweigh the minimal risks identified in the review.
Researchers stated that the evidence supports updating statin drug labels and patient information leaflets. They called for these materials to more accurately reflect the risks confirmed by clinical trial data.
The review's findings are based on data from randomized controlled trials and do not include observational studies. The authors focused on evidence that could be directly linked to statin use through rigorous trial methodology.
* This article is based on publicly available information at the time of writing.
Sources and further reading
- Do statins really cause those side effects? What the data shows | STAT
- Study finds statins do not cause the majority of label side effects - BHF
Note: This section is not provided in the feeds.
More on Health
-
Escambia and Santa Rosa Schools Send Students Home Amid Measles Scare
A health notice describes the removal of students exhibiting fever or rash, according to health officials. The outbreak is linked to measles cases.
-
Measles Exposure Alert Issued for Multiple Locations in Washington DC
A public health alert was issued on February 9, 2026, regarding measles cases linked to various locations, according to DC Health.
-
UK Organ Transplant Waiting List Reaches Record High as Family Consent Drops
The UK organ transplant waiting list has hit a record 8,096, with family consent for donation dropping to 59%, according to official figures.
-
AI Reshapes Entry-Level Job Market for New Graduates
Entry-level job postings in the US dropped 35% over two years, with Big Tech cutting new graduate hiring by 25% in 2024, according to reports.
-
Peptide Therapy Gains Popularity Amid Regulatory and Safety Concerns
Peptide therapy is gaining traction for health benefits, but many products lack FDA approval and safety data, according to regulatory warnings.